Raul Reyes, Jr. v. Monica L. Reyes

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 23, 2009
Docket04-09-00632-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Raul Reyes, Jr. v. Monica L. Reyes (Raul Reyes, Jr. v. Monica L. Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raul Reyes, Jr. v. Monica L. Reyes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



                      • • • •



MEMORANDUM OPINION


No. 04-09-00632-CV


Raul REYES, Jr.,

Appellant


v.


Monica REYES,

Appellee


From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2002-CI-01711

Honorable Jim A. Rausch, Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2009


DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION


            The clerk’s record was originally due on September 25, 2009. On October 6, 2009, the trial court clerk filed a Notification of Late Record, stating that the clerk’s record is complete, but has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On October 20, 2009, this court ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court no later than October 30, 2009 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. Our order cautioned appellant that if he failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, on November 16, 2009, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing no later than November 23, 2009 why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellant has not responded.

            This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Raul Reyes, Jr. v. Monica L. Reyes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raul-reyes-jr-v-monica-l-reyes-texapp-2009.