Raul J. Stevens v. Gilberto Lucio and Estela Lucio
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-09-00642-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
RAUL J. STEVENS, APPELLANT,
v.
GILBERTO LUCIO AND ESTELA LUCIO, APPELLEES.
On Appeal from the 103rd District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Raul J. Stevens, appealed a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas. On December 2, 2009, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5. The Clerk directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of that notice. On June 15, 2010, the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not cured within ten days. To date, the defect has not been corrected.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s failure to correct this defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed
5th day of August, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raul J. Stevens v. Gilberto Lucio and Estela Lucio (Raul J. Stevens v. Gilberto Lucio and Estela Lucio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.