Raul Gonzalez III v. Valley Designs Construction

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 26, 2005
Docket13-05-00056-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Raul Gonzalez III v. Valley Designs Construction (Raul Gonzalez III v. Valley Designs Construction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raul Gonzalez III v. Valley Designs Construction, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-05-056-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


RAUL GONZALEZ, III, ET AL.,                                           Appellants,


v.


VALLEY DESIGNS CONSTRUCTION,                                    Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellants, RAUL GONZALEZ, III, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2000-CCL-116-B. The parties have filed a joint motion to reverse and remand. In the motion, the parties state that they have settled this matter. The parties request that, without reference to the merits, the judgment of the trial court be reversed and remanded for entry of settlement. The parties also request expedited issuance of the Court’s mandate.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties’ joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for entry of settlement. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same.  

                                                      PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of May, 2005.


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Raul Gonzalez III v. Valley Designs Construction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raul-gonzalez-iii-v-valley-designs-construction-texapp-2005.