Raul Gonzales, Iii v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 25, 2009
Docket13-09-00161-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Raul Gonzales, Iii v. State (Raul Gonzales, Iii v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raul Gonzales, Iii v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion





NUMBER 13-09-00161-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG




RAUL GONZALES, III, Appellant,

v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.



On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Raul Gonzales, III, attempts to appeal a conviction for aggravated robbery. The trial court has certified that "the defendant has waived the right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On March 30, 2009, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. Counsel responded to this Court's order by filing a motion identifying substantive reasons for appeal, but did not advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On June 11, 2009, this Court abated and remanded the cause to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether the appellant has the right to appeal. The trial court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law indicating that appellant gave up his right of appeal by signing a written waiver, and by waiving that right on the record after admonishment by the trial court.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.



PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 25th day of August, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Raul Gonzales, Iii v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raul-gonzales-iii-v-state-texapp-2009.