Raul Aguero Ayala v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
November 18, 2016
No. 04-16-00388-CR
Raul Aguero AYALA,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. B14466
Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal and requests that he be permitted to withdraw as appellant’s counsel. Counsel certifies he has served a copy of the brief on appellant and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief. Counsel also certifies that he has forwarded copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records to appellant.
If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within forty-five days from the date of this order. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
If appellant files a timely pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. Alternatively, if appellant does not file a timely pro se brief, the State may file a brief in response to counsel’s brief no later than thirty days after the pro se brief is due.
We further ORDER the motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s counsel to be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-82 (1988); Schulman v. State, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
Karen Angelini, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 18th day of November, 2016.
Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raul Aguero Ayala v. State (Raul Aguero Ayala v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.