Raul Aaron Tadeo v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: April 4, 2019
• Docket: 14-19-00113-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Abatement Order filed April 4, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-19-00113-CR NO. 14-19-00116-CR ____________

RAUL AARON TADEO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1522508 and 1522474

ABATEMENT ORDER

The trial court, the Hon. Vanessa Velasquez, presiding, did not submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to make written fact findings and conclusions of law as to whether a challenged statement was made voluntarily, even if appellant did not request them or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.22 § 6; Urias v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). The statute is mandatory and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate the appeal and direct the trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987).

Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this Court on or before May 3, 2019.

The appeals are abated, treated as closed cases, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeals will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeals filed by either party.

PER CURIAM