Rauh v. State ex rel. Unverferth
This text of 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 429 (Rauh v. State ex rel. Unverferth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment modified and affirmed as modified.
The court find that in ascertaining' the amount for which the court of common pleas should have rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant the court of appeals correctly found that the sum of $376.75 should be added to the judgment, but this court finds that the item of $22, referred to in the report of the referee, should have been deducted from the amount of the judgment rendered by the court of common pleas.
It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, modified in this, to-wit: that the amount of said judgment as found by said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, reduced in the sum of $22 as of the date of the entry of said judgment of the court of appeals.
It is further ordered and adjudged that as thus modified the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
It is further ordered that the costs in this court be paid one-half by each of said parties.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rauh-v-state-ex-rel-unverferth-ohio-1915.