Rauen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rauen v. State

1925 OK CR 168, 234 P. 1112, 30 Okla. Crim. 183, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 175

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 1, 1925

DocketNo. A-4845.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 168 (Rauen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rauen v. State, 1925 OK CR 168, 234 P. 1112, 30 Okla. Crim. 183, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 175 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

The information in this case charges that Leonard Rauen did willfully and without lawful excuse omit to furnish necessary food, clothing, and shelter for his minor child, Lawrence Rauen, age 20 months. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding him guilty as charged in the information, and fixing his punishment at a fine of $100. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on September 15, 1923, a petition in error with case-made.

The defendant is not represented by counsel in this court, and no brief in support of the assignments of error has been filed. In cases of this kind, we do not consider it the duty of this court to go into a careful examination of the evidence to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the information and the instructions of the court, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment of the county court of Oklahoma county is accordingly affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

BESSEY, P. J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

The information in this case charges that Leonard Rauen did willfully and without lawful excuse omit to furnish necessary food, clothing, and shelter for his minor child, Lawrence Rauen, age 20 months. On the trial the jury returned a verdict finding him guilty as charged in the information, and fixing his punishment at a fine of $100. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on September 15, 1923, a petition in error with case-made.

The defendant is not represented by counsel in this court, and no brief in support of the assignments of error has been filed. In cases of this kind, we do not consider it the duty of this court to go into a careful examination of the evidence to determine whether or not the trial court erred in the admission or rejection of testimony. We have examined the information and the instructions of the court, and we have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment of the county court of Oklahoma county is accordingly affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

BESSEY, P. J., concurs. EDWARDS, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 168, 234 P. 1112, 30 Okla. Crim. 183, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rauen-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.