Raudel Ortega-Moharo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, George K. Rosenberg, Director

441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10265
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 11, 1971·No. 26580·Published

Opinion

441 F.2d 658

Raudel ORTEGA-MOHARO, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, George K. Rosenberg,
Director, Respondent.

No. 26580.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 11, 1971.

David C. Marcus (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

James R. Dooley (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., of INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel of INS, San Pedro, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of U.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

The order of deportation is affirmed.

Petitioner asserts he was illegally arrested and, therefore, as an alien he can't be deported.

In principle, the case is not unlike the theory of Ramirez et al. v. Lozoya, 9 Cir., 253 F.2d 85, cert. denied, 357 U.S. 941, 78 S.Ct. 1391, 2 L.Ed.2d 1554.

---------------

1 The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raudel Ortega-Moharo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, George K. Rosenberg, Director, 441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10265 (9th Cir. 1971).

441 F.2d 658 (Raudel Ortega-Moharo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, George K. Rosenberg, Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related