Raudel Ortega-Moharo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, George K. Rosenberg, Director
This text of 441 F.2d 658 (Raudel Ortega-Moharo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, George K. Rosenberg, Director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
441 F.2d 658
Raudel ORTEGA-MOHARO, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, George K. Rosenberg,
Director, Respondent.
No. 26580.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 11, 1971.
David C. Marcus (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
James R. Dooley (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., of INS, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph Sureck, Regional Counsel of INS, San Pedro, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of U.S., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District judge.
PER CURIAM:
The order of deportation is affirmed.
Petitioner asserts he was illegally arrested and, therefore, as an alien he can't be deported.
In principle, the case is not unlike the theory of Ramirez et al. v. Lozoya, 9 Cir., 253 F.2d 85, cert. denied, 357 U.S. 941, 78 S.Ct. 1391, 2 L.Ed.2d 1554.
---------------
1 The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 F.2d 658, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raudel-ortega-moharo-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-george-k-ca9-1971.