Rauch v. State

344 S.W.3d 783, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 647, 2011 WL 1758798
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 10, 2011
DocketWD 72314
StatusPublished

This text of 344 S.W.3d 783 (Rauch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rauch v. State, 344 S.W.3d 783, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 647, 2011 WL 1758798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rauch appeals the circuit court’s denial of his post-conviction motion to reopen his Rule 24.035 post-conviction proceedings. Rauch claims that he was entitled to reopen his post-conviction case because he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bates
344 S.W.3d 783 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
344 S.W.3d 783, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 647, 2011 WL 1758798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rauch-v-state-moctapp-2011.