Rauch v. State
344 S.W.3d 783, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 647, 2011 WL 1758798
Opinion
ORDER
Michael Rauch appeals the circuit court’s denial of his post-conviction motion to reopen his Rule 24.035 post-conviction proceedings. Rauch claims that he was entitled to reopen his post-conviction case because he was abandoned by post-conviction counsel. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rauch v. State, 344 S.W.3d 783, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 647, 2011 WL 1758798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
344 S.W.3d 783 (Rauch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bates
344 S.W.3d 783 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)