Rauch v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rauch v. State

218 S.W.3d 439, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 2006 WL 3193738

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 7, 2006·No. WD 64921·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Michael E. Rauch appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 24.035 to vacate his judgment and sentence after he pled guilty to first-degree murder and armed criminal action. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Rauch’s motion. Rauch argues on appeal that the motion court’s findings and conclusions that plea counsel *440 was not ineffective were clearly erroneous. He also raises for the first time on appeal that the plea court did not have jurisdiction, that his due process rights were violated and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Michael E. Rauch appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 24.035 to vacate his judgment and sentence after he pled guilty to first-degree murder and armed criminal action. After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Rauch’s motion. Rauch argues on appeal that the motion court’s findings and conclusions that plea counsel *440 was not ineffective were clearly erroneous. He also raises for the first time on appeal that the plea court did not have jurisdiction, that his due process rights were violated and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Rauch v. State, 218 S.W.3d 439, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1681, 2006 WL 3193738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

218 S.W.3d 439 (Rauch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.