Rauch v. New York, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
29 N.Y. St. Rep. 999
This text of 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 999 (Rauch v. New York, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rauch v. New York, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 999 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Reversed on opinion of Titus, J., in Reining v. Same defendant. Titus, J., did not sit in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 N.Y. St. Rep. 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rauch-v-new-york-lackawanna-western-railroad-nysuperctbuf-1889.