Raucci v. State

684 So. 2d 289, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12921, 1996 WL 709353
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 1996
DocketNo. 95-02320
StatusPublished

This text of 684 So. 2d 289 (Raucci v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raucci v. State, 684 So. 2d 289, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12921, 1996 WL 709353 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Michael Allen Raucci, challenges the trial court’s judgments and sentences in circuit court case numbers 94-2852 and 93-3046.

After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the appellant’s convictions without discussion. However, since the trial court did not orally pronounce the $2 cost that was imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), in either case number 94-2852 or 93-3046, we strike those costs. Sanders v. State, 678 So.2d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed as modified.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Sanders v. State
678 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
684 So. 2d 289, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12921, 1996 WL 709353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raucci-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.