Raubicheck v. Snedecor
5 Misc. 595, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 899
This text of 5 Misc. 595 (Raubicheck v. Snedecor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Raubicheck v. Snedecor, 5 Misc. 595, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 899 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
Upon an examination of this case we find no errors. It involved a question of fact which was fairly and fully submitted to the jury. They had a right, to accept and believe the evidence of one side or the other. By their verdict, it is clear they accepted the plaintiff’s version.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Ehrlich, Ch. J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Misc. 595, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raubicheck-v-snedecor-nynyccityct-1893.