Rau v. Schweizer

Eleventh Circuit

Rau v. Schweizer

669 F. App'x 554

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedOctober 13, 2016

DocketNo. 16-10230 Non-Argument Calendar

StatusPublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 554 (Rau v. Schweizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rau v. Schweizer, 669 F. App'x 554 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a police officer, plaintiff claims that the officer procured her false arrest and malicious prosecution in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court granted the officer summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. The plaintiff appeals. We conclude that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated in the District Court’s dispositive order of December 22, 2015.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a police officer, plaintiff claims that the officer procured her false arrest and malicious prosecution in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court granted the officer summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. The plaintiff appeals. We conclude that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated in the District Court’s dispositive order of December 22, 2015.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

669 F. App'x 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rau-v-schweizer-ca11-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack