Ratto v. Ratto

California Supreme Court

Ratto v. Ratto

275 P. 784, 206 Cal. 661, 1929 Cal. LEXIS 651

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 9, 1929

DocketDocket No. S.F. 12771.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 275 P. 784 (Ratto v. Ratto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ratto v. Ratto, 275 P. 784, 206 Cal. 661, 1929 Cal. LEXIS 651 (Cal. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to dissolve a partnership and for an accounting. The court found the existence of the partnership and on the accounting taken entered judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $441.58 as his share of the profits. In support of the appeal it is contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings on the main issues of the partnership and accounting. There is substantial conflict in the evidence as to these matters and the judgment may not be disturbed on that ground.

The partnership business was the sale of soft drinks, cigars and tobacco, and light lunches. The defendant further urges that the evidence shows that the parties were engaged, in part, in the illicit sale of intoxicating liquors at their place of business and that, therefore, no relief should have been granted either party. The evidence on this point was sharply in conflict and showing against the contention of the defendant was sufficient to support the findings of the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to dissolve a partnership and for an accounting. The court found the existence of the partnership and on the accounting taken entered judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $441.58 as his share of the profits. In support of the appeal it is contended that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings on the main issues of the partnership and accounting. There is substantial conflict in the evidence as to these matters and the judgment may not be disturbed on that ground.

The partnership business was the sale of soft drinks, cigars and tobacco, and light lunches. The defendant further urges that the evidence shows that the parties were engaged, in part, in the illicit sale of intoxicating liquors at their place of business and that, therefore, no relief should have been granted either party. The evidence on this point was sharply in conflict and showing against the contention of the defendant was sufficient to support the findings of the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 P. 784, 206 Cal. 661, 1929 Cal. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratto-v-ratto-cal-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack