Rattner v. Kleiman
48 S.W.2d 439, 1932 Tex. App. LEXIS 300
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rattner v. Kleiman. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 S.W.2d 249 →
Opinion
The record and statement of facts only were filed in this case, and neither party filed briefs.
We have examined the record for fundamental error, but find none that should cause a reversal; hence, in the absence of briefs of either party, we find it our duty to affirm the judgment of the court, which we do.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rattner v. Kleiman, 48 S.W.2d 439, 1932 Tex. App. LEXIS 300 (Tex. Ct. App. 1932).
48 S.W.2d 439 (Rattner v. Kleiman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.