Rattliff v. McPeak

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7645

NORMAN RATTLIFF, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GERALD MCPEAK, Superintendent, New River Valley Regional Jail; N. H. PELKINS, Correctional Officer Supervisor, New River Valley Regional Jail; JOHN DOE, JR., Primary Care Physician, New River Valley Regional Jail,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00551-gec-mfu)

Submitted: December 8, 2010 Decided: December 23, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Rattliff, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Norman Rattliff, Jr., appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2006), for failure to state a claim, and

denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Rattliff v.

McPeak, No. 7:08-cv-00551-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. Dec. 31, 2008 & Mar.

19, 2009). Further, we deny Rattliff’s motion for the

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED