Ratti v. City of San Francisco

Ninth Circuit

Ratti v. City of San Francisco

966 F.2d 532

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 1992

DocketNo. 91-15615

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 966 F.2d 532 (Ratti v. City of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ratti v. City of San Francisco, 966 F.2d 532 (9th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment. Furthermore, we do not find a basis for suspending the normal operation of the one year statute of limitations. We also note without deciding that the action is probably barred in light of Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 762 n. 2, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 2184 n. 2, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment. Furthermore, we do not find a basis for suspending the normal operation of the one year statute of limitations. We also note without deciding that the action is probably barred in light of Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 762 n. 2, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 2184 n. 2, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

966 F.2d 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratti-v-city-of-san-francisco-ca9-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack