Ratti v. City of San Francisco

Ninth Circuit

Ratti v. City of San Francisco

966 F.2d 532

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1992·No. No. 91-15615·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment. Furthermore, we do not find a basis for suspending the normal operation of the one year statute of limitations. We also note without deciding that the action is probably barred in light of Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 762 n. 2, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 2184 n. 2, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment. Furthermore, we do not find a basis for suspending the normal operation of the one year statute of limitations. We also note without deciding that the action is probably barred in light of Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 762 n. 2, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 2184 n. 2, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989).

AFFIRMED.

Ratti v. City of San Francisco, 966 F.2d 532 (9th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

966 F.2d 532 (Ratti v. City of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related