Rattancraft of California v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 276
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1955
DocketNo. 58743; protest 226707-K (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished
This text of 34 Cust. Ct. 276 (Rattancraft of California v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rattancraft of California v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 276 (cusc 1955).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 Cust. Ct. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rattancraft-of-california-v-united-states-cusc-1955.