Rattancraft of California v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 276
United States Customs Court·Decided February 3, 1955·No. No. 58743; protest 226707-K (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of floor coverings, composed wholly or in chief value of rush and not of grass or of rice straw, which do not have a felt base, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstracts 57889 and 57890, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rattancraft of California v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 276 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 276 (Rattancraft of California v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.