Ratnour v. Fissell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Ratnour v. Fissell

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 795, 1927 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1044

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 18, 1927

DocketNo. 3046

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 795 (Ratnour v. Fissell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ratnour v. Fissell, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 795, 1927 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1044 (Ohio Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

FULL TEXT.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant in eiuor, Minnie Fissell, brought an action against Ratnour and Vandt, for damages caused to furniture and household goods. Fissell had occupied a certain building as a tenant for about eight years. On April 2'ith, the owners served notice on the tenant to vacare the premises. A similar notice was served on May 3rd. May 10th, following, the owners removed the roof from the building, and this action was prosecuted to recover damages to property due to that act.

The Court entered judgment on the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff, and this action is prosecutea to reverse that judgment.

Section 10449 General Code authorizes an action in forcible entry and detainer, when the tenant íefuses to vacate premises.

Section 10461 General Code requires that notice shall be served three days before instituting an action. The owners of the premises took the. law in their own hands by proceeding contrary to the provisions of the statute.

The judgment of the Court below will be affirmed.

(Hamilton, PJ., and Cushing, J., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI