Ratner v. Cemoni
This text of Ratner v. Cemoni (Ratner v. Cemoni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DARA L. RATNER,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D17-3858
SHIRLEY A. CEMONI,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 15, 2018
Petition for Writ of Prohibition, Renee A. Roche, Respondent Judge.
Miguel R. Acosta and Dale T. Gobel, of Gobel Flakes, LLC, Orlando, for Petitioner.
Jeffrey M. Byrd, of Jeffrey M. Byrd, P.A., Orlando, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, Dara L. Ratner, petitions this court for a writ of prohibition after the trial
judge denied her motion for disqualification as legally insufficient. While most of
Petitioner’s allegations are insufficient to warrant disqualification, we find the final
allegation legally sufficient. Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying the motion, and
we grant the petition.
PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION GRANTED.
ORFINGER, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ratner v. Cemoni, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratner-v-cemoni-fladistctapp-2018.