Ratliff v. State

42 S.W.2d 431, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 957
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ratliff v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 Tex. Crim. 142
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 14, 1931·No. No. 14626·Published

Opinion

CALHOUN, J.

The offense is. forgery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ratliff v. State, 42 S.W.2d 431, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 957 (Tex. 1931).

42 S.W.2d 431 (Ratliff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.