Ratliff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ratliff v. State

1911 OK CR 439, 117 P. 1132, 6 Okla. Crim. 645, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 390

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided September 23, 1911·No. No. A-745.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Tom Ratliff, was convicted in the county court of Ellis county on the 12th day of January, 1911, on-a charge of selling whisky, and on the 14th day of January, 1911, sentenced by the court to pay a fine of four hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No brief has been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no apeparanee made for oral argument in his behalf. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed for want of prosecution, under rule 4 of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Tom Ratliff, was convicted in the county court of Ellis county on the 12th day of January, 1911, on-a charge of selling whisky, and on the 14th day of January, 1911, sentenced by the court to pay a fine of four hundred dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No brief has been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no apeparanee made for oral argument in his behalf. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed for want of prosecution, under rule 4 of this court.

Ratliff v. State, 1911 OK CR 439, 117 P. 1132, 6 Okla. Crim. 645, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 390 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

1911 OK CR 439 (Ratliff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.