Ratliff v. State

320 S.W.3d 740, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2010 WL 3681651
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 2010·No. ED 93985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Travis Ratliff (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ratliff v. State, 320 S.W.3d 740, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2010 WL 3681651 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 740 (Ratliff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thiele v. Thiele
320 S.W.3d 740 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)