Ratliff v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ratliff v. State

338 So. 2d 1146, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15670

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ratliff v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14462 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1976·No. No. 76-850·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After consideration of the record and briefs, oral argument having been waived, the appellant having failed to make reversible error clearly appear, the judgment is affirmed. Our decision is without prejudice to appellant to file a motion pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 alleging appropriate grounds for withdrawal of his guilty plea and/or ineffective assistance of counsel.

AFFIRMED.

McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After consideration of the record and briefs, oral argument having been waived, the appellant having failed to make reversible error clearly appear, the judgment is affirmed. Our decision is without prejudice to appellant to file a motion pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 alleging appropriate grounds for withdrawal of his guilty plea and/or ineffective assistance of counsel.

AFFIRMED.

McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Ratliff v. State, 338 So. 2d 1146, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15670 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

338 So. 2d 1146 (Ratliff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.