Ratliff v. Rubenstein

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6181

CLINTON RATLIFF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JIM RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, West Virginia Division of Corrections; EVELYN SEIFERT, Warden, Northern Regional Jail & Correctional Facility; ROBERT KNIGHT, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (5:05-cv-00052-FPS)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton Ratliff, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Cameron Petty, Stephanie Ann Jones, ROSE PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia; Charles Patrick Houdyschell, Jr., WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, Charleston, West Virginia; David L. Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Clinton Ratliff appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3), 1986

(2000) as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B); 1915A(b)

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that the appeal is

frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Ratliff v. Rubenstein, No.

5:05-cv-00052-FPS (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -