Ratley v. State

275 So. 3d 842
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 2019·No. No. 1D18-4184·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Michael Ratley appeals the trial court's order denying his Motion for DNA Testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. Appellant argues that the trial judge had previously disqualified himself from the underlying case and thus erred in ruling on Appellant's motion. We agree. Therefore, we vacate the order under review and remand this case to the trial court so a successor judge can rule on the motion. See Davis v. State, 849 So. 2d 1137, 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) ("Once a trial judge recuses himself from a given case, any subsequent orders he enters in that case are void and have no effect."); Adderley v. State , 224 So. 3d 776 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

VACATED and REMANDED .

Ray, C.J., and B.L. Thomas and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ratley v. State, 275 So. 3d 842 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

275 So. 3d 842 (Ratley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
849 So. 2d 1137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Adderley v. State
224 So. 3d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)