Ratka v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
This text of 2013 ND 90 (Ratka v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 90
Peter Ratka, Appellant
v.
Director, North Dakota Department
of Transportation, Appellee
No. 20130083
Appeal from the District Court of Mercer County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Michael R. Hoffman, P.O. Box 1056, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1056, for appellant.
Michael T. Pitcher, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General, 500 North 9th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4509, for appellee.
Ratka v. North Department of Transportation
[¶1] Peter Ratka appealed from a district court judgment affirming an administrative decision revoking his driving privileges for a period of one year. Ratka argues that he was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to speak with an attorney before deciding whether to submit to a blood test, that he did not refuse to submit to an onsite screening test, and that his driving privileges could not be revoked for refusing an onsite screening test under the circumstances in this case. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratka-v-nd-dept-of-transportation-nd-2013.