Rathenberger v. Jacob

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Rathenberger v. Jacob

167 N.W. 271, 167 Wis. 273, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 84

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedApril 3, 1918

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 167 N.W. 271 (Rathenberger v. Jacob) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rathenberger v. Jacob, 167 N.W. 271, 167 Wis. 273, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 84 (Wis. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Eschweileb, J.

Justice Rosenberry did not participate in tbis case. Tbe Chief Justice and Justices Vinje and OwEN are of tbe opinion that tbe judgment should be reversed; Justices SiebeoKeb, Kerwin, and tbe writer that it should be affirmed. It follows under tbe rule that tbe judgment of tbe lower court must be affirmed. Estate of Carter, ante, p. 89, 166 N. W. 657,

By the Court. — The judgment of tbe circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eschweileb, J.

Justice Rosenberry did not participate in tbis case. Tbe Chief Justice and Justices Vinje and OwEN are of tbe opinion that tbe judgment should be reversed; Justices SiebeoKeb, Kerwin, and tbe writer that it should be affirmed. It follows under tbe rule that tbe judgment of tbe lower court must be affirmed. Estate of Carter, ante, p. 89, 166 N. W. 657,

By the Court. — The judgment of tbe circuit court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 N.W. 271, 167 Wis. 273, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rathenberger-v-jacob-wis-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack