Rathbun v. Markham

New York Supreme Court

Rathbun v. Markham

43 How. Pr. 271

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 How. Pr. 271 (Rathbun v. Markham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rathbun v. Markham, 43 How. Pr. 271 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

James C. Smith, J.

—Motion under section 160 of the Code,- to require parts of the complaint to be made definite and certain. ^Such a motion is a substitute for a special demurrer for want of form, and the moving papers should point out wherein the alleged defect consists. The motion papers in this case being defective in that respect, the motion is denied, but without costs (as the question is new), and with leave to renew it at the next special term, and time to answer is extended till that term. Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James C. Smith, J.

—Motion under section 160 of the Code,- to require parts of the complaint to be made definite and certain. ^Such a motion is a substitute for a special demurrer for want of form, and the moving papers should point out wherein the alleged defect consists. The motion papers in this case being defective in that respect, the motion is denied, but without costs (as the question is new), and with leave to renew it at the next special term, and time to answer is extended till that term. Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 How. Pr. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rathbun-v-markham-nysupct-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack