Rathbone v. Riley

Connecticut Superior Court

Rathbone v. Riley

3 Day 503

DecidedFebruary 15, 1807

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Day 503 (Rathbone v. Riley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rathbone v. Riley, 3 Day 503 (Colo. Ct. App. 1807).

Pincite

Opinion

Swift, Pr. J.

in summing up to the jury, said, that if they found the deed from Brooks to Tryon to be fraudulent, the copy of the attachment left in the town clerk’s office, and the record of the execution, was constructive notice in law to the defendant, and to all the world, that the plaintiffs claimed tlic demanded premises ; and that the levy of the execution by the plaintiffs vested in them a legal title thereto.

The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs, widen wsc accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swift, Pr. J.

in summing up to the jury, said, that if they found the deed from Brooks to Tryon to be fraudulent, the copy of the attachment left in the town clerk’s office, and the record of the execution, was constructive notice in law to the defendant, and to all the world, that the plaintiffs claimed tlic demanded premises ; and that the levy of the execution by the plaintiffs vested in them a legal title thereto.

The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs, widen wsc accepted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Day 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rathbone-v-riley-connsuperct-1807.