Rathbone v. Lownsbury

2 Wend. 595
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 Wend. 595 (Rathbone v. Lownsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rathbone v. Lownsbury, 2 Wend. 595 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1829).

Opinion

By the Court, Marcy, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiff to set aside the report of a referee. It appears by the rule of reference that the cause was referred to a single person. It cannot therefore be regarded as a reference under the statute ; it is merely an arbitration. The case of Dodge v. Waterbury & Coles, (8 Cowen’s Rep. 136,) is conclusive against the present motion. The court in that case considered a reference to two, with power to choose a third, in the light of a mere arbitration. The reference of a cause to one without any power to associate others with him, is a still stronger case. We cannot interfere with the report, or, more properly speaking, the award made in this case.

Motion denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCleary v. McCleary
37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 154 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
Paulison v. Halsey
37 N.J.L. 205 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1874)
Green v. Patchin
13 Wend. 293 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wend. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rathbone-v-lownsbury-nysupct-1829.