Rathbone v. Blackford

New York Supreme Court

Rathbone v. Blackford

1 Cai. Cas. 343, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 260

DecidedAugust 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 343 (Rathbone v. Blackford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rathbone v. Blackford, 1 Cai. Cas. 343, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 260 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not sufficient. There does not appear to be any relation between the party served and the attorney. The notice might have been given to a mere stranger. A connection ought, therefore, to have been stated, so that the court might be convinced of a privity between the party to whom the notice is delivered, and the attorney on whom it is meant to take effect. See ante, p. 73.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is not sufficient. There does not appear to be any relation between the party served and the attorney. The notice might have been given to a mere stranger. A connection ought, therefore, to have been stated, so that the court might be convinced of a privity between the party to whom the notice is delivered, and the attorney on whom it is meant to take effect. See ante, p. 73.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cai. Cas. 343, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rathbone-v-blackford-nysupct-1803.