Rathbone v. Blackford

New York Supreme Court

Rathbone v. Blackford

1 Cai. Cas. 343, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 260

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rathbone v. Blackford. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Cai. Cas. 588 →

New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1803·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not sufficient. There does not appear to be any relation between the party served and the attorney. The notice might have been given to a mere stranger. A connection ought, therefore, to have been stated, so that the court might be convinced of a privity between the party to whom the notice is delivered, and the attorney on whom it is meant to take effect. See ante, p. 73.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is not sufficient. There does not appear to be any relation between the party served and the attorney. The notice might have been given to a mere stranger. A connection ought, therefore, to have been stated, so that the court might be convinced of a privity between the party to whom the notice is delivered, and the attorney on whom it is meant to take effect. See ante, p. 73.

Rathbone v. Blackford, 1 Cai. Cas. 343, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 260 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Pincite

1 Cai. Cas. 343 (Rathbone v. Blackford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.