Rath v. United New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilot's Ass'n
This text of 331 F.2d 307 (Rath v. United New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilot's Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A consideration of the points raised by the defendants-appellants demonstrates that they are without merit. Contrary to the appellants’ contentions the plaintiff has stated claims upon which relief could be granted. The court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the parties and its judgment in favor of the plaintiff was well founded in fact and in law. Careful scrutiny of the procedure leading up to the trial and an examination of the proceedings at trial demonstrate neither unfairness nor prejudice to the appellants. Consequently, the judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 F.2d 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rath-v-united-new-jersey-sandy-hook-pilots-assn-ca3-1964.