Rath v. Texas Company

148 N.E. 721, 240 N.Y. 598, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 829
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1925·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; ho opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Lehman, JJ. Dissenting: Andrews, J. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rath v. Texas Company, 148 N.E. 721, 240 N.Y. 598, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 829 (N.Y. 1925).

148 N.E. 721 (Rath v. Texas Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.