Rath v. McNaught
This text of 158 A.D. 906 (Rath v. McNaught) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the affidavits for the remedy by arrest made a prima facie case of actionable fraud without reference to the proceedings in the suit of Eastmond v. McNaught (ante, p. 903), the order denying, the motion to vacate the order of arrest is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 A.D. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rath-v-mcnaught-nyappdiv-1913.