Rates Technology, Inc. v. Mediatrix Telecom, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Giniteh étatefi Qtnurt of Qppeals fur the jfeheral @irmit

RATES TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, ‘

AND

JAMES B. HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

MEDIATRIX TELECOM, INC. AND MEDIA5 CORPORATION, '

Defendants-Appellees, AND

BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP, Defendant.

2011-1384

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in case no. O5-CV-2755, Judge Joanna Seybert.

ON MOTION

ORDER

RATES TECH V. MEDIATRIX TELECOM 2

James B. Hicks moves for a 60-day extension of time, until January 20, 2012, to file his reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

DEC 03 2”“ Isl Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: James B. Hicks, Esq. Ethan Horwitz, Esq.

s21

FILED 8.3. 0 OF APPEALS FOR THE FE ERAt CIRCUIT

DEC 082011

JAN HDRBALY CLERK