Ratcliffe v. State

660 So. 2d 1384, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 481, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1995 WL 559928
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1995
DocketNo. 85203
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 660 So. 2d 1384 (Ratcliffe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ratcliffe v. State, 660 So. 2d 1384, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 481, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1995 WL 559928 (Fla. 1995).

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Ratcliffe v. State, 651 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), wherein the district court affirmed an order of the trial court upholding the constitutionality of section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), Florida’s anti-stalMng statute. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have recently found the anti-stalking statute constitutional. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla.1995). We approve Ratcliffe.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hill
660 So. 2d 1384 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 So. 2d 1384, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 481, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1995 WL 559928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratcliffe-v-state-fla-1995.