Ratcliffe v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Ratcliffe v. State

660 So. 2d 1384, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 481, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1995 WL 559928

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 21, 1995·No. No. 85203·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Ratcliffe v. State, 651 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), wherein the district court affirmed an order of the trial court upholding the constitutionality of section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), Florida’s anti-stalMng statute. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have recently found the anti-stalking statute constitutional. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla.1995). We approve Ratcliffe.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Ratcliffe v. State, 651 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), wherein the district court affirmed an order of the trial court upholding the constitutionality of section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), Florida’s anti-stalMng statute. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have recently found the anti-stalking statute constitutional. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla.1995). We approve Ratcliffe.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Ratcliffe v. State, 660 So. 2d 1384, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 481, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1995 WL 559928 (Fla. 1995).

Pincite

660 So. 2d 1384 (Ratcliffe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related