Ratcliff v. State
This text of 268 So. 2d 858 (Ratcliff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of carnal knowledge of a girl under, twelve years of age and his punishment was fixed at thirty years in the penitentiary.
The incident occurred at the home of the victim during the night of August 11, 1970. She gave a description of her assailant to the police which led to the apprehension of appellant. A line-up was conducted that same night which resulted in the appellant’s being identified, as the guilty party.
Appellant’s sole contention on appeal was that he was not accorded the right to counsel at the time of the line-up as required by United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149, and Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178. Since this case was submitted, the United States Supreme Court has on June 7, 1972, rendered a decision in Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682, 92 S.Ct. 1877, 32 L.Ed.2d 411, which is dispositive of the issues in this cause.
Therefore, on the authority of Kirby, supra, the judgment appealed from is due to be and is hereby'
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
268 So. 2d 858, 49 Ala. App. 77, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratcliff-v-state-alacrimapp-1972.