Ratcliff v. Industrial Life Ins. Co.

163 So. 428
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 7, 1935·No. No. 16264.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us on motion to dismiss the appeal; appellee contending that it should be dismissed, for the reason that no citation of appeal was issued or served. The appeal was requested by motion, and the order was granted as a result of the motion. The record contains nothing on which we can base the conclusion that the motion was not made in open court and, in the absence of any such showing in the record, we will assume that it was made in open court. See Richardson v. Caloavello, 3 La. App. 535; Bishop-Wyatt Co. v. Latin-American Life & Casualty Ins. Co., Inc., 12 La. App. 58, 125 So. 167; James v. City of New Orleans, 14 La. App. 311, 125 So. 464; Marsh v. Avegno, 3 La. App. 294, 295; Swain v. Globe Lumber Co., Ltd., 144 La. 207, 80 So. 256, 257.

If the appeal was granted on motion in open court, as we must assume that it was under the authorities above set forth, there was* no necessity that a citation issue or be served. See the above authorities, particularly Swain v. Globe Lumber Co., supra, in which the court said: “The appeal having been granted in open court, no further citation was necessary.”

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ratcliff v. Industrial Life Ins. Co., 163 So. 428 (La. Ct. App. 1935).

163 So. 428 (Ratcliff v. Industrial Life Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Home Finance Service v. Walmsley
174 So. 651 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)