Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry

Appellate Court of Illinois

Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry

14 Ill. App. 509, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 12

DecidedApril 18, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ill. App. 509 (Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ratcliff v. Cincinnati Type Foundry, 14 Ill. App. 509, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 12 (Ill. Ct. App. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

We are of opinion the court properly sustained the demurrer to the bill, but that the case must be reversed because the evidence upon which the damages were assessed is not preserved in the record.

So much of the decree as relates to the sustaining of the demurrer will therefore be affirmed, and so much of it as relates to the assessment of damages upon the dissolution of the injunction, will be reversed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

We are of opinion the court properly sustained the demurrer to the bill, but that the case must be reversed because the evidence upon which the damages were assessed is not preserved in the record.

So much of the decree as relates to the sustaining of the demurrer will therefore be affirmed, and so much of it as relates to the assessment of damages upon the dissolution of the injunction, will be reversed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Ill. App. 509, 1884 Ill. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratcliff-v-cincinnati-type-foundry-illappct-1884.