Ratchford v. Fisk

26 A.D.2d 685, 272 N.Y.S.2d 1008
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 6, 1966
DocketAction No. 1; Action No. 2
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 685 (Ratchford v. Fisk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ratchford v. Fisk, 26 A.D.2d 685, 272 N.Y.S.2d 1008 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

In consolidated negligence actions, plaintiffs Ratchford in Action No. 1 and two of said parties as defendants in Action No. 2 appeal from (a) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered March 8, 1965, and (b) said judgment as amended by an order of said court entered April 28, 1965, which, upon a jury verdict, dismissed their complaint in Action No. 1 and was in favor of the plaintiff against them in Action No. 2. Amended judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeals from the original judgment, entered March 8, 1965, dismissed as academic, without costs. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davidson v. Julian Bolt & Screw Co.
86 Misc. 919 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.D.2d 685, 272 N.Y.S.2d 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ratchford-v-fisk-nyappdiv-1966.