Ratajczak v. Board of Educ. of City of Perth Amboy

182 A. 897, 116 N.J.L. 162, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 213
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1936·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfteld, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — -None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ratajczak v. Board of Educ. of City of Perth Amboy, 182 A. 897, 116 N.J.L. 162, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 1936).

182 A. 897 (Ratajczak v. Board of Educ. of City of Perth Amboy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fury v. New York & Long Branch Railroad
22 A.2d 286 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)
Drew v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
100 S.W.2d 516 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1937)