Rasten v. Town of Brookline

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 11, 2001·No. 00-2480·Published

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 00-2480 01-1218

ANINA RASTEN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

TOWN OF BROOKLINE, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Morris E. Lasker, Senior U.S. District Judge]

Before

Boudin, Chief Judge, Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges.

Anina Rasten on brief pro se. George F. Driscoll, Jr., Office of Town Counsel, on brief for appellees.

DECEMBER 4, 2001 Per Curiam. After due consideration of record and

briefs on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons

given by the district court.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rasten v. Town of Brookline, (1st Cir. 2001).

Rasten v. Town of Brookline (Rasten v. Town of Brookline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.