Rasten v. Gelbond

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 11, 2001·No. 01-1375·Published

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 01-1375

ANINA RASTEN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

BLAIR GELBOND,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Circuit Judge, Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

Anina Rasten on brief pro se.

DECEMBER 4,2001 Per Curiam. After due consideration of the record

and the appellant’s brief, we perceive no error in the

district court’s decision.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rasten v. Gelbond, (1st Cir. 2001).

Rasten v. Gelbond (Rasten v. Gelbond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.