Rasten v. Bournewood Hospital

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 6, 2001·No. 00-2269·Published

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-2269

ANINA RASTEN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

BOURNEWOOD HOSPITAL; BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________

No. 01-1028

ANINA RASTEN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SUMNER GOLDBERG AND MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge] [Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge] Before

Boudin, Chief Judge, Selya and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Anina Rasten on briefs pro se.

June 27, 2001 Per Curiam. We consolidate these appeals and,

after due consideration, affirm for the reasons given by the

district court. Neither complaint succeeded in stating a

federal claim.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rasten v. Bournewood Hospital, (1st Cir. 2001).

Rasten v. Bournewood Hospital (Rasten v. Bournewood Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.