Rassman v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.
87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 701, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 147
This text of 87 A. 271 (Rassman v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rassman v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co., 87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 701, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 147 (Colo. 1913).
Opinion
The evidence failed to establish the neglect by the defendant of any duty owed by it to the *702 intestate and showed negligence on the part of the intestate in attempting to coast across the railway track in front of the car without observing the latter’s approach. The verdict was therefore properly set aside.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 701, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rassman-v-shore-line-electric-railway-co-conn-1913.