Rassman v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.
87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 701, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 147
Opinion
The evidence failed to establish the neglect by the defendant of any duty owed by it to the *702 intestate and showed negligence on the part of the intestate in attempting to coast across the railway track in front of the car without observing the latter’s approach. The verdict was therefore properly set aside.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rassman v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co., 87 A. 271, 87 Conn. 701, 1913 Conn. LEXIS 147 (Colo. 1913).
87 A. 271 (Rassman v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.