Rasmussen v. National Transportation Safety Board

100 F. App'x 836
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2004
DocketNo. 03-1352
StatusPublished

This text of 100 F. App'x 836 (Rasmussen v. National Transportation Safety Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rasmussen v. National Transportation Safety Board, 100 F. App'x 836 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Opinion

[837]*837 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This petition for review of an order of the National Transportation Safety Board was considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied. An applicant may not obtain a first class airman medical certificate if he has a medical history or clinical diagnosis of psychosis, see 14 C.F.R. § 67.107(a)(2); Petition of Arechavala, 3 NTSB 3060 (1990), and the agency’s finding that petitioner has a medical history and clinical diagnosis of psychosis is supported by substantial evidence. See 49 U.S.C. §§ 1153(b)(3) and 46110(c).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Judicial review
49 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(3)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 F. App'x 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rasmussen-v-national-transportation-safety-board-cadc-2004.