Raskin v. State

94 S.E. 628, 21 Ga. App. 511, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 681
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 19, 1917
Docket9351
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 628 (Raskin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raskin v. State, 94 S.E. 628, 21 Ga. App. 511, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

No error of law is complained of. The evidence fulfy authorized the finding of the trial judge, exercising by consent the function's of both judge and jury. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 628, 21 Ga. App. 511, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raskin-v-state-gactapp-1917.